|
DIY-WEBLOG:
Friday, October 26, 2001
... and then I found a whole "pencam subculture," just by reading a thread on metafilter. That's the danger of letting people self-publish... until, of course, Stephen Brill starts publishing "Brill's Pencam Content."
posted 3:52 PM [link
to this entry] [respond]
[top]
Thursday, October 25, 2001
From the "el cheapo" but cool department: Last year for Christmas I got a "Pencam" digital camera, a little super-cheap digicam originally sold on QVC (or HSN?) and now sold on TV and other stores. The coolest thing about the camera is that it is small as hell and produces useable pictures. And when it produces less-than-great pictures, sometimes they turn out kinda cool anyway. I use it occasionally, mostly outside because the thing needs loads of light, and anything less than bright indoor light or daylight makes it emit a disapproving noise and refuse to take a picture. It's fun, though not a substitute for a real multi-mega-pixel cam that has a flash--and because of that it tends to sit on the desk more often than not.
And then I stumbled upon this website: pencam.org. It's a gallery of pencam images put together by another pencam user, who apparently takes a lot of pencam pics. Like me, this guy puts all his pics through photoshop to balance things out, and you can see from his galleries that when you do this you can get some nice pics.
It reminds me of the Fisher-Price Pixelvision camcorder that was available in the late 80s. That cam recorded low-quality, low-resolution black and white video onto standard audiocassettes, and was obviously aimed at children. But because the images it produced were interesting and stylized, the thing ended up becoming popular with artists and video experimenter. So, what started out as a cheap little toy ends up being a sought-after tool for artists/fetishists.
So I wonder if that's what'll happen to the Pencam in another 5 years... mmmm, probably not. But maybe I'll be inspired to make my own pencam gallery.
posted 10:30 AM [link
to this entry] [respond]
[top]
I know that minidisc has become the recording format of choice for much of radio journalism--especially is cost-conscious community radio and indymedia. The New York Times acknowledges the recent growth of the format and attributes it to a little device that makes it easier to copy mp3s from your computer to your MD in the digital domain. (via minidisc.org)
posted 8:52 AM [link
to this entry] [respond]
[top]
Wednesday, October 24, 2001
The Cleaner MPEG SuperCharger just arrived this morning -- damn that's fast service (I ordered it Monday). Will install it this afternoon and report back later.
posted 10:18 AM [link
to this entry] [respond]
[top]
Monday, October 22, 2001
Earlier this summer the lab where I work got one of the first inexpensive DVD-R/RW drives and I'm learning how to put it to use. It's a Pioneer DVR-A03, which is also available bundled with Apple's G4s and some Compaqs, and has an ATAPI interface, rather than SCSI. So far I've mostly used DVD-R to back up large quantities of data found it to be very useful and fast for getting 4.7 GB of data offloaded from your hard drive. I've had less time and success trying to make a video DVD. The first major roadblock is the bundled myDVD softward by Sonic. It's too simple and inflexible to be at all useful. So we upgraded to DVDit SE, which is much more powerful and flexible, especially when it comes to making chapter points and menus.
But the major hassle is that compressing video to MPEG2 -- the standard for DVD -- is slooooow. My video editing machine is a dual Pentium III Xeon 550 box running Win2k, and it still takes about 30 minutes to compress 1 minute of video. One major annoyance to this is that I have yet to find an inexpensive compression application that is dual-processor ready -- so that means my machine is only running at about 1/2 its capability, hence why it's sloooow. So I got approval to order up Cleaner MPEG SuperCharger which is a software/hardware package for speeding up MPEG encoding. I'll report on how well it works when it arrives.
posted 2:26 PM [link
to this entry] [respond]
[top]
I haven't had much time to mess around with it, but MPEG-4 (also known as DivX) promises to provide very high quality video -- on par with DVD's MPEG-2 -- at much lower data rates, which means you can get around 60 minutes of near-DVD quality video crammed onto a CD-R. Using a DVD-R or DVD-RAM for data, you could get in the neighborhood of 4-5 hours of good quality video (currently only playable on a computer). Tom's Hardware Guide has kept up with developments in MPEG-4 and has a good review of the new version 4.01 of DivX and the Flask compression application.
posted 2:01 PM [link
to this entry] [respond]
[top]
Saturday, October 13, 2001
The New York Times has a short, simple article outlining the basic camcorder formats out there. I don't understand why these articles always seem to have amazingly erroneous pricing info. This article says Digital Video (DV) cams cost $1000-$3000, but you can easily buy one for as little as $500 - $600 at your local Best Buy or similar store, and even for as little as $300 if you do value shopping on-line. I wonder if it's just a covert way to make people more inclined to spend more and pay retail.
posted 1:13 PM [link
to this entry] [respond]
[top]
Friday, October 12, 2001
Doing it yourself often means having good, cheap tools available. For almost any type of media production you need to have some kind of word processing and other office suite software. For free, you can try out Sun's new Star Office 6 beta, which is supposed to have very good Microsoft compatibility, and is, I'll note again, free. Sure beats the new draconian licensing schemes and the high cost associated with Microsoft Office XP. Extreme Tech also has a short article and review of Star Office 6.
posted 1:23 PM [link
to this entry] [respond]
[top]
Thursday, October 11, 2001
This is the first entry for the DIY files blog. This blog will absorb all the techie, A/V geek and similar posts, leaving the main mediageek.org blog to focus more on issues of media politics and policy. This blog will probably be updated less often than the main blog, but there will also be longer features and reviews that will be more conveniently archived on the right side there--->
posted 4:16 PM [link
to this entry] [respond]
[top]
|
The DIY files
is a storehouse of information to help the do-it-yourself media
maker.
The DIY-blog will feature
the newest entries -- news and info for the media DIYer.
|